Archive for the 'Directory Talk' Category
Recently there has been an influx of low quality sites, and it required more time to delete them or assign them to appropriate categories. To prevent further abuse of the directory because it is free and simple to submit, the text description minimum character requirement has been increase to two hundred characters. Those who choose […]
Why do webmasters submit unfinished websites to a directory? It is an automatic ban from a directory when it is reviewed. Now they have wasted their time, and the directory administrator’s time in the whole process. Not only that, they risk all future inclusions of the website that was banned because they can no longer […]
I know a lot of directory submissions are done once and forget about it. But if a directory allows you to modify or append to your submission, then do it for the added SEO benefits. Why settle for your entry looking alike throughout one thousand directories when an existing entry can be made better?
I have decided to enter this directory contest only because I truly believe Fatinfo is a strong directory in its own right without extreme high page ranks, or page strength determined by existing SEO tools and deserves more recognition. Most people think just because a directory is free means it is not worth their time […]
Added Fatinfo directory to w3csites.com where all sites conform to W3C standards, and Index-It.net where sites have to be 100% SEO friendly with appropriate title, description, keyword meta tags.
Link detail pages help a directory grow exponentially on every submitted entry. However, it is a catch 22 because the same entry has already been submitted to every other directory before yours and will likely end up being indexed into the supplemental index. This is how I feel when making the same entry submission to […]
If your directory is not a forum or a community, do not expect submitters to keep reusing the same login to submit different sites because that is just not going to happen. The requirement to register before submitting a site to any directory is a major roadblock to the success of that particular directory unless […]
Image verification is NOT a must if the directory is well maintained. It is seriously an unfounded fear that a directory will be flooded with spam that most directory owners have simply because the feature is included into a directory software package.
If a webmaster does not care about making their submission entry as guideline acceptable […]
Google made a nice acquisition of YouTube for $1.65 billion and turned Sequoia’s initial $11.5 million investment into $480 million. Very nice jackpot for Sequoia in less than one year. According to the deal, YouTube will continue to operate independently.
Chad and Steve grew the company to $1.65 billion in less than two years. They are […]
These damn SEO contests are retarded and encourage webmasters to spam as many directories as possible to get a backlink to their sites for the specified term as written in the title of this article. The prize money offered is up to ten thousand to rank number one on MSN. If you have a directory, […]
Search
About
You are currently browsing the fatinfo.com weblog archives for the 'Directory Talk' category.
Longer entries are truncated. Click the headline of an entry to read it in its entirety.Latest
Archives
- September 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
Categories
- Advertisers (18)
- CSS (1)
- Directory Mod (3)
- Directory Talk (29)
- Email Marketing (2)
- Health Products (4)
- Interesting Sites (28)
- Off Topic (60)
- Search Manipulation (23)
- SEO (23)
- Submit a Site (10)
- Wiki (1)
- WordPress (8)
